Sunday, 8 June 2014
Sunday, 3 February 2013
Some effects of petting
Boys
and girls should know what their sex experimentation is all about. A kiss for
example, can express friendship and companionship and a general appreciation of
other aspects of a relationship. What does petting express besides
self-gratification? If a couple really care for each other, they should be
bringing more to sex than mere pleasure. Outside of marriage, this is not
possible, and sensible couples will not get involved in anything that will
endanger emotional and intellectual growth in other spheres of their lives.
The sex pleasure obtained from petting by mutual consent may satisfy a young couple for a while, but it may have the disadvantage of blocking any further interest in each other as persons. Such a relationship tends to become restricted; for the couple may have nothing else in common but the pleasure obtained from the exploitation of each other’s body.
Many people who have talked over these problems with counsellors have admitted that other problems follow in the wake of petting. Social evenings, for example, become battles for control, and the light-hearted enjoyment of former times turns to tension and conflict. Often there is an over-all feeling of frustration, even disgust, with themselves and with sex in general. On the other hand, when sex is kept in an important place but in control, it is forming the attitudes and habits towards self and the opposite sex that will be carried on into later life.
Once it is understood that sexual expression alone is not the most desirable goal in life, and that much more is needed to achieve satisfaction, it becomes obvious that it is sensible to sacrifice one kind of temporary satisfaction in order to realize a better set of values. Youth, for example, needs the respect of others, the ability to work in with others, particularly with friends and parents, and, most important of all, it needs self-respect.
Moreover, we do have stronger desires than the desire of sex satisfaction. We desire to be needed, for example; we desire to love and be loved. These desire do not manifest themselves as urgently as the sex desire sometime does, it is true, and so they often pass unnoticed. Those who constantly indulge their sexual desires before marriage risk losing the ability to achieve these goals. They tend particularly to lose their self-respect. Such people often “protest too much” in trying to rationalise their behaviour, and, because of the dominance of their sexual desire, they have a sense of enslavement which may have far-reaching effects on their whole lives. Petting provides “instant pleasure”, but the easy way is not always the best way. It must not be thought, however, that young people, drawn to each other in the normal “youth to youth since the world began” manner, ought to have a relationship lacking in warmth and affection. But if there is a true mutual appreciation, there will be concern and thoughtfulness in their relationship, and not a “using” of each other for self-gratification. In other words, the couple will treat each other as persons, and their attitude to each other will reflect their own attitude towards life in general.
In sex matters, this means that those who are attracted to one another want a relationship that is based on much more than physical enjoyment. They want the good of the other person, they want the respect of those who already love and are responsible for that person, and they want to develop their own ability to know such a person. Thus, they prepare themselves for true love that may be yet to come.
The giving-in to the desire for quick and easy sex pleasure is a stumbling-block to such developments. Sex pleasure becomes an end in itself. When sex demands are not made, however, couples learn to talk and listen to each other and get to know each other as persons. This gradually establishes a companionship basis that will provide a valuable contribution to their happiness in marriage, if the attraction proves to be a lasting one. If it does not, they will still have taken a valuable step towards maturity.
Wednesday, 9 January 2013
Petting and the sexual progression
Part
of the behavior pattern of the youth of today is the practice known as petting.
Popular, even widespread, among the young, petting is a trifling with sex that
is harmful in its effects; but, because they consider it from a short-range
rather than a long-range point of view, young people continually try to justify
the practice. It is precisely because there are no easily-perceived unpleasant
consequences that petting is not recognized as a lack of control.
Now, as we have pointed out, control
is necessary in every sphere of life, and in sex matters, as in all other, a
lack of control must inevitably have harmful consequences, though these may not
be immediately apparent.
One of the most serious dangers of
petting is that it is merely the first step in a sexual progression. Those who
indulge in it gain immediate pleasure, but they need more stimulation on the
next occasion in order to obtain the same degree of pleasure. Thus progression
is made through kissing to caressing, then to sexual intercourse. As soon as
one tension is released, another is created. The problems resulting from such a
progression are often involved and frustrating.
The sexual progression ought to be
understood by young people. Those who need to express affection in a warm and
natural way do not, of course, find the progression inevitable. But those who
permit petting for the immediate pleasure it yields should be aware of the
problem of control they must face as a consequence.
An argument frequently used by youth
in endeavoring to justify petting is: “Everyone is doing it”, Even if this
were true – and it is not – the fact would not make wrong conduct right. Nevertheless,
youth is inexperience, and the conversation and conduct of others make an
impression and influence conduct. This is often the case when virtue is mocked,
when the desire for popularity and approval is uppermost, or when the need for
affection or the need to be “with it” is felt. Young people do not like to be
different: they like to be accepted by their peers. Moreover, to many who are
frustrated and unsuccessful in other spheres, petting is a tempting and easy
alternative.
These facts give some ideal of the
interaction of causes that lead young people into sex experimentation on date
and outings. Where couples both have the same high moral standards, they are
relatively free from strain and conflict: for they have a better understanding
of what sex contribute to life, seeing it as a creative human joy, rather than
a negative thing like an avoidance of frustration or a relief of tension.
Sex is for loving, and not for mere
pleasure. Young people in love who want to remain chaste must try to keep this
clearly before their minds. They will naturally want to kiss and embrace, but
these signs of affection will only turn into petting if their purpose, which is
to express love, is forgotten. Consequently, couples will avoid caresses that
are sexually stimulating and that are likely to lead to further liberties. In avoiding
such liberties, they are really showing their love and consideration for each
other. The sacrifice entailed is a real proof of this.
Monday, 31 December 2012
Is sexual control Injurious?
We
often hear it said that sexual control is injurious mentally and physically. Nothing
is more contrary to the truth. It is true that the sexual instinct is powerful
and recurrent. It is also true that many things in our modern environment are
sexually exciting and make restraint difficult. Indeed, living conditions
themselves are often such that any easily-grasped pleasure seems desirable and
attractive. Consequently, a whole host of reasons are put forward to
rationalize and justify sexual licence.
Among these is the claim that it is
unnatural to suppress such a strong desire and that such suppression leads to
neuroses and personality problems and even worse.
These ideas which are put forward by
various people, and even by some psychiatrists, are contrary to science and
experience. Research has revealed the fact that it is not suppression but
irregular sex relations, whether inside or outside the married state, that do
damage physically, mentally and socially. There is, indeed no evidence either
from physiology, from psychology or from experience, that sexual intercourse
for the unmarried is necessary to maintain physical or mental health. In other
words, chastity is possible for all.
It is not difficult for anyone to
cite numerous examples from among his acquaintance of those who have controlled
their sexual impulses and have still been happy and able to contribute their
share to the welfare of the community, without any suggestion of damaged
personalities.
In fact, it is well known that many
people deliberately undertake a life of continence to dedicate their lives to
some cause which they have at heart. This kind of sacrifice, which is the
result of a whole-hearted commitment and which is a free and deliberate act of
the will, is not detrimental to the personality, but rather a satisfying and
enriching experience. It is often necessary, in various spheres of life, to
sacrifice one set of cherished interests for the achievement of others, even
more valued. It is by no means rare for the sexual mode of life to be deliberately
sacrificed in this way. Those who make this sacrifice may still value and
appreciate the sexual power that they possess, but without any harm to their
health or personalities, they may choose not to use them.
No-one has to yield in sexual
matters. We choose freely. But it is important to note that a right choice is
made only when pros and cons have been carefully pondered and understood. Once a
decision is made, based on a firm conviction of what we really know is best,
then we have a reasonable chance of controlling our desires.
There is a vast difference between
wrong attitudes towards sex and control or suppression of sex. Wrong attitude
can certainly be harmful. They may consist in not acknowledging the sexual side
of our natural and of building up unnatural barriers. This often springs from a
faulty training or education in sex matters which has engendered a false sense
of guilt where none should exist, or from a lack of basic and essential knowledge.
Such attitudes can also be the result of some shocking experience encountered
earlier in life. Those who feel they have a wrong attitude towards sex should
seek advice from some competent person – a doctor, a clergyman, or some older
person whom they respect. In serious cases, where there is real disturbance, a
reputable psychiatrist should be consulted.
Young people should think well ahead
to other goals they wish to achieve during the years to come. These goals may
actually depend for their success on the self-control exercised before
marriage, and impulsiveness during youth may have far-reaching effect in putting
the fulfilment of the most cherished needs and desires out of reach. Such needs
and desires do not make themselves felt as urgently in youth as does sex, but
they ultimately matter much more to the mind and heart. When they are not
fulfilled, regret and even bitterness may often result.
A lack of self-mastery, indeed,
inspires no confidence in self or in others, and, since partners in life are
expected to give support by sharing problems and helping to solve them, this
lack of responsibility is a serious obstacle to happiness in marriage. A lax
and selfish attitude towards sex should show a red right to anyone who can read
the signs.
Modern society makes great demands
on the young, but the rewards of winning through are also great. Those who can
control their sexual desire are preparing for a life of which the quality will
be high. They will enjoy a family life lived in peace and understanding,
because they will have learned how to make the necessary sacrifices
intelligently and generously.
Monday, 3 December 2012
Sex out of marriage
Can sex out of marriage ever
bring the best values to human love?
This
kind of love desires above all the good of the beloved, and therefore it has
its fulfilment only in the security of marriage.
In a successful marriage, each
partner needs to have complete confidence in the other. Sex conduct before
marriage has an important bearing on the degree of this confidence. If each was
able to control his or her sexual impulses before marriage and, by doing so,
was able to show consideration for the security of the other, then the effects
will last throughout a lifetime. On the many occasions when abstinence within
marriage is found necessary, each can feel sure of the other’s capacity for
faithfulness. Such self-control in matters of sex, if won early in life, is a
great stand-by in times of crisis, and, besides being a source of comfort, it
tends to influence other spheres of life also. For in married life people soon find
that other readjustments requiring discipline are frequently needed to achieve
happiness. The person whose past sex experience has been dominated by sheer
animal pleasure finds it difficult to adjust to a situation in which the good
of a loved one is now the main object.
Some couples who claim to be sure of
their love for each other have no qualms about the morality of intercourse
before marriage. This certainty may not last if another attraction is
experienced some years after marriage. The thought of the pre-marital conduct
will make it easier for the tempted part to yield, and it will also cause grave
alarm to the other partner.
The temptation that many lovers have
to satisfy the other sexually before marriage is based on the idea that this is
in the interests of the other person. This notion is mistaken for many reasons.
One obvious reason is that intercourse before marriage makes marriage itself
almost second-hand - at least, in one important aspect. But, more important still,
couples find that once sexual intercourse is experienced, it is almost
impossible to discontinue it. Peace of mind is often destroyed, in spite of the
lax moral standards of the times. Apart from the danger of pregnancy, such
experiences affect the girl in spite of herself – often morally and
emotionally, such a hurt is deeper when marriage does not follow, and when she
later meets someone whom she loves and respects and wishes to marry.
Per-marital sex often, of itself,
breaks up an association. It does this for physiological and psychological
reasons, since, outside marriage, nether sex nor love is given a fair chance;
and an association often breaks up that would, in the state of marriage, have
worked out quite normally.
Another point of view is that those
who rush prematurely into sex relations risk spoiling their chances of getting
to know and appreciate one another as persons, and, consequently, their love
will not develop in the way it should. This development follows from a gradual
discovery of each other’s qualities of mind and heart. It is this progressive
discovery, rather than sex relations, that leads more surely to happiness, for sex
alone is not a true bond. We see this clearly in those boys who consort with
“easy” girls, then move on without a qualm.
When a boy urges a girl to “prove”
her love, he often forgets that she can scarcely, if ever, be as uninhibited as
he can; for she has the ever-present possibility of pregnancy and accompanying
anxiety that goes on for month after month. If he really loves her, he cannot
afford to ignore this, no matter how willing he himself is to take the risk.
Because of pregnancies through
“mistakes”, many marriages have to be hastened and responsibilities undertaken
before the couple are ready. The problems attached to pregnancy, both social
and personal, are there before the wedding-day, and because of this, the young
couple feel a resentment. This state of affairs naturally takes the edge off the
joy of marriage.
When a marriage in these
circumstances does not take place, there is always heartbreak for the pregnant
girl. She has to face many problems both before and after the birth of her
child, and she finds, to her dismay, that society is far from being as
“permissive” as she had imagined. In fact, one of the ironies of modern life is
that society just does not approve of pregnancies outside marriage. Yet this is
the very same society that bombard its youth with, or allows its youth to be
bombarded with, every kind of erotic stimulant, through the media of sexy
advertisements, sexy fashions, sexy entertainments and the like.
Young people who are deeply in love
but unable to marry for some time, for educational or economic reason, have a
special problem. They cannot help feeling that the act of union here and now
has the same spiritual meaning that it will have for them when they are
married. They discount the fears of unwanted pregnancy and other social
consequences, and they require other reason for abstaining from expressing
their love. Such a reason can only be found in an understanding of what
marriage means. They should realize that to be biologically ready for marriage
does not necessarily imply that a couple are culturally and morally prepared.
Marriage is the greatest adventure they will encounter in life, and it requires
for its success all sorts of qualities that have barely begun to develop during
adolescence.
Nevertheless, the necessity of
having to wait before marriage can create a conflict which requires skill and
courage to resolve. It can only be resolved, in fact, by honest discussion and
by coming to a right decision. Then it is up to the couple to support each
other in keeping to the decision. Life, they should realize, will be full of
conflicts, and many more serious decisions will lie ahead of them than those
concerning sex control.
Marriage at an earlier date is an
alternative, though this solution may have other effects, educationally or
vocationally. Otherwise, the young couple must learn together how to forgo an
immediate pleasure for a greater future good, and to respect the values of
those who love them and also the values of their future children.
Since marriage calls for a constant,
self-sacrificing love, and since this is the only kind of love upon which
happiness can be based, the self-sacrifice must begin before marriage, not only
financially and socially, but also emotionally.
These considerations take us back to
the meaning of love as the driving force of life. They stress the big gulf
between pleasure and the happiness of the beloved at heart, but also the
welfare of all those responsible for or dependent on the beloved. This latter
truth is often selfishly overlooked.
Admittedly, continence is difficult
for young people nowadays. But it is by no means impossible; and those who
desire to maintain or achieve it can do so by keeping the meaning of sexual
love clearly before their minds and by avoiding all situations which might be a
temptation to them – drinking too much, being alone together in a secluded
place for too long, being in the lounge or the car with the light out and with
nothing else to do but want each other, and similar dangerous situations. If a
couple are really in love, they can be a strong support and help to each other
in controlling themselves for something which they value more than immediate
and passing pleasure.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)